They both appealed against this as well, but these were rejected in June.Īpple's argument to the Supreme Court is that the previous courts were wrong to apply a universal injunction that affects how it handles transactions from all developers, insisting Epic is 'an individual, non-representative plaintiff.'Įpic, meanwhile, told the Supreme Court that the Ninth Circuit's standard for pausing previous cases is 'far too lenient.' Its only victory was the rule on anti-steering practices.īoth Epic and Apple appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit, which supported the ruling. In that high-profile legal battle, Epic lost nine out of ten antitrust claims when facing Apple in the District Court of California. However, it criticised Apple's legal arguments, saying that the company is ignoring the factual record and rulings made so far in this case.Įpic now wants this pause to be lifted and for the Supreme Court to uphold the original decision from 2021.

On July 18, Reuters reported the Ninth Circuit paused the ruling on anti-steering and gave Apple 90 days to prepare its appeal to the Supreme Court.

Reuters reported that the Fortnite firm is asking the highest court in the US to overrule a decision made earlier this month by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that paused the original injunction.Īt the start of July, Apple filed its own appeal to the Supreme Court asking it to overrule the 2021 decision that it must cease its anti-steering practices that mean all microtransactions are handled through iOS and therefore generate a 30% fee that goes to Apple. Epic Games has filed a request with the US Supreme Court, asking for it to support a previous court ruling that forbids Apple from preventing developers directing players to payment systems outside the iOS ecosystem.

Epic vs apple fortnite